
I understand Senator Feingold's point of view, but I must respectful
ly disagree with him. In an ideal world the United State's would have public funding of elections, which would excise the special interest money from all sides of the equation, that, however, is not the current reality. Citizens United has changed the whole game and until a law is written to change the dynamic set in motion by the ruling, or a rational Supreme Court exists that can limit the damage of Citizens United with followup rulings, the election financing game is what it is.
If the Left is honorable while the Right isn't the Left will not be able to compete in elections economically. That is the bottom line. Like it or not.
Honestly, it would be wise for Progressives to read Theodore Roosevelt's autobiography or a biography about him and see how a confrontational Progressive that consistently won battles operated. How he was able to bend the playing field in his direction to move his agenda.
Progressives have promise, but are still too timid. The Conservatives furnished the campaign battlefield with the Citizens United ... now it is incumbent on the Progressives to defeat them on that battlefield.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
No comments:
Post a Comment